Blog Posts

Blog Posts: 711
Items per page
Statistics: Blogs: 104 Blog Posts: 711   1 2 3 ... 24 Previous Next

You just opened this blog (Thank You!) and about five seconds have past by the time you get HERE.

Please give me 50 more seconds of your time (starting now) and tell me which of the following things we could add - or, are most beneficial to you - at our Business Transformation Center website.

·         Instructional videos

·         Marketing support material

·         Technical information

·         Managed print best practices

·         Something else (Tell me! Tell me!)

Tell me here! (You can see the site here too!)

And if you can spare a bit more time, here's the fine print:

I want 2010 to be the year managed print services really take off for you.

And if you're thinking of adding managed print services, I want the Business Transformation Center to be a destination that really does help you get started, and help grow your business.

Check it out later!

And Happy Holidays!

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Sometimes in the IT industry, you see stories that are almost too absurd to believe. The Richmond Times-Dispatch has one of those stories. First published this past Saturday, the article explains why Virginia's state government has been swamped with so many issues ever since a brand new, completely revamped IT system was put in place by government integrator Northrop Grumman.

 

Apparently, the state's system has no -- I repeat, no -- network backups.

 

It's absurd, right? Well, it gets worse when you consider that Virginia's old, outdated IT systems used to have sufficient network backups in place before Northrop Grumman was brought on. So what happened?

 

Let's go back to the beginning: Northrop Grumman was commissioned by the state in 2005 to update Virginia's outdated technology, which includes everything from PCs and servers to cell phones. In a historic 10-year deal, Virginia agreed to outsource its IT systems to Northrop Grumman for $2 billion. The agreement was unique in that a private company was basically taking over a state government's IT infrastructure; Northrop Grumman even planned to hire nearly 1,000 Virginia state IT workers. At the time, the deal was seen a potential model for other states grappling with IT upgrades and budget constraints.

 

But it didn't take long for the agreement to start spiraling out of control. The project was hit with delays, and doubts about Northrop Grumman's ability to get the job done started to surface; the company had made its name as a defense contractor rather than a systems integrator, and this was by far the biggest IT outsourcing deal it had ever won. This past June, Virginia fired its CIO and began a probe of the outsourcing deal. The Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC) of Virginia's General Assembly issued a report this fall, and the findings of the probe were not flattering for Northrop Grumman. The JLARC report found that indequate planning by the integrator "largely led to delays," though some blame fell on state agency employees who were slow to adopt some of Northrop Grumman's changes.

 

Outsourcing deals and large-scale IT projects can be messy, so some of this is understandable and can even be forgiven. But what can't be understood is the complete lack of foresight and common sense that led to Northrop Grumman rolling out a network that had no redundancy whatsoever. And Northrop Grumman's mistake is causing Virginia severe headaches. According to the Times-Dispatch article, Virginia's Department of Motor Vehicles suffered 12 major network outages over just five weeks this fall. Virginia's new CIO George Coulter immediately discovered this rather glaring deficiency and called for an emergency meeting to resolve the matter. To make matters worse, Coulter also found that network backups weren't explicity called for in the outsourcing deal.

 

Wow. I hope Northrop Grumman doesn't use that as an excuse. I mean, who launches a new computer network without the most basic support measures? Isn't this a basic rule of common sense? What happened to the old Boy Scout motto "be prepared"? Does Jimmie Johnson need to tell his crew chief to stock a few extra tires and some gas before a race? Do I need to tell my doctor, 'Hey, if by some slim chance my hearts stops during surgery, do you think maybe you could hit me up with the defibs?'

 

It's absurd. It's outrageous. It's unforgiveable. And it's why the Virginia-Northrop Grumman deal will be a cautionary tale for years to come.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Community member MarcusIT used the Ask a Blogger a Topic buttons in the SMB Channel Voice group to ask this question: Any last minute tax tips for businesses before 2009 ends?

Here you go, and this is advice my own accountant was not aware of (and it’s a great way to close a last minute sale, or bill a larger tech refresh in this calendar year)

Tell customers about the Depreciation and Section 179 Expense

In 2008, businesses were able to take “bonus” depreciation expense of up to 50% of the cost of newly acquired fixed assets. This provision has been extended for assets placed in service in 2009.

How it works:

Customers make a technology investment in 2009

Calculate its depreciation using the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) table

Deduct up to $250,000 on 2009 tax

Example: Computers are a 5-Year property based on MACRS

Customer purchases of $20,000 in computer systems can deduct $2,304*

(based on straight line depreciation in year 4)

Here’s a link to the IRS details and forms:

                http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/article/0,,id=177054,00.html

Also:

                Don’t forget the special depreciation allowance for certain property.

You may be able to take an additional first year special depreciation allowance for certain qualified property. The allowance is an additional deduction of 50% of the property’s depreciable basis (after any section 179 deduction and before figuring your regular depreciation deduction).

Property that qualifies for this special depreciation allowance includes the following.

Tangible property depreciated under the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) with a recovery period of 20 years or less

Water utility property

Off-the-shelf computer software

Qualified leasehold improvement property

Here's the info:

                http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/article/0,,id=177054,00.html

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

As reported earlier this year, the next wave of Core iX processors from Intel will be hitting the streets in the first quarter of 2010. Dual-core, 32nm, LGA1156 Core i3 and i5 processors with clock speeds ranging from 2.93 to 3.46 GHz should offer some excellent performance value for system builders interested in entry-level and/or mid-range desktops. Some of these Clarkdale chips are even more attractive due to low pricing, which goes from USD $284 for the dual-core 3.46 GHz Core i5 all the way down to $123 for the dual-core 2.93 GHz Core i3. There is even a 2.8 GHz dual-core Pentium chip for $87.

 

What really catches our eye is the upcoming Core i9 series. Based on the LGA1366 socket, these 32nm, six-core Gulftown processors will run on 130W of power, come with 12 MB of L3 cache, and have an operating frequency of at least 2.8 GHz which will ramp up to at least 3.23 GHz thanks to Turbo Mode. No exact release date or pricing is available yet, but we do have some benchmark results.

 

PC Lab in Poland got their hands on a six-core Gulftown chip, and the performance was head and shoulders above comparable Core i7 chips. The 2.8 GHz Gulftown showed a 50 percent overall performance jump over a Core i7 920, which isn’t a surprise since the Core i9 has six cores instead of four.

 

When it came to overclocking, the Core i9 chip made to a blistering 4.32 GHz, which is extraordinary when you consider the BIOS and motherboard hurdles the Core i9 had to deal with. X58 motherboards have the proper socket, but current models and BIOS versions aren’t meant to mingle with six-core processors. Knowing Intel, a new chipset will accompany the Core i9 processors, or at the very least you will see a plethora of board revisions and BIOS updates.

 

If you consider yourself a high-end system builder, then the Core i9 family is certainly a game-changer for you. Anyone who demands the highest performance possible should be on the lookout come January.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

It's been nearly five years after Carly Fiorina was ousted as CEO of Hewlett-Packard, and now her controversial tenure and divisive record as the head of HP will become the centerpiece of her campaign for the U.S. Senate in California. Running as a Republican, she's challenging incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer and she's touting her achievements at HP as evidence that she's ready to be a government leader. A recent statement from her campaign site says it all: "Carly made HP a stronger company."

 

Is it true? Or is Fiorina spinning things in her favor?

 

It seems a little unconventional to run a political campaign based on your record as a CEO when the company you worked for fired you and paid you $21 million to leave. But then again, when she was hired by HP in 1999 after a successful run as a group president at Lucent, Fiorina immediately became the most high-profile (not to mention, powerful) female CEO in America. She was the first female head of a Fortune 20 company and a company in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. So we are talking about some major -- even historic -- achievements.

 

But it's hard to overlook her tumultuous tenure as head of HP, from proxy battles and layoffs over the hotly debated Compaq merger, to supporting offshore development and the expansion of the HB-1 visa program. In addition, the disruptive merger caused countless issues for HP channel partners, who were grasping at shrinking margins while trying to fend off IBM, Dell and other competitors. While Fiorina has received much credit for making the bold decision to acquire Compaq and developing a vision for a stronger, more diversified IT company, she was widely criticized for lacking the leadership and management skills to successfully execute that vision. As a result, HP had lost roughly half its stock value when Fiorina was finally forced out. (for additional reading, check out this AP story on Fiorina's campaign)

 

But Fiorina sees things differently. Her site points out that in 1999, her first year as CEO, HP's net revenue was $42 million. "When she left the company in February 2005," the site states, "HP’s net revenues had more than doubled to $86.7 billion and continued in the years that followed." Her campaign site also credits Fiorina with starting HP's current impressive five-year growth period.

 

"Despite persistent criticism from the media, rivals and political opponents since she left the company, Carly’s contribution to HP’s current strength is recognized by knowledgeable observers," Fiorina's campaign site states. "Carly Fiorina’s vision and leadership of Hewlett‐Packard (HP) set the company’s trajectory on a long‐term path for growth and global dominance. In an era of quick profits and short‐term strategies, it is important to take a step back and undertake a sober review of historical data. Many of the decisions made by Carly as CEO led directly to HP becoming a market leader with a global reach. Simply put, Carly made tough decisions to reform the company that were criticized at the time, but HP and its shareholders are now reaping the rewards of those decisions."

 

Perhaps a "sober review of historical data" will indeed put Fiorina's HP record in a new, more positive light. In any event, this senate race will be an interesting one to watch, whether you're a Golden State resident or not.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Dell had a tough time last week, reporting earnings that had dipped 15 percent from the same quarter one year ago.  Some didn’t waste any time wondering if solution providers would take this as a prime opportunity to kick the vendor while it was down.


But the day after the report of the quarterly drop, Greg Davis, Dell’s global channel chief, spoke with ChannelWeb about the company’s partner program. According to Davis, Dell’s channel program continues to perform well hitting its top line number in the U.S., with strong performances in the midmarket and SMB space. But it appears that EqualLogic continues to be the bright spot for Dell.


Partners continue to flock to the EqualLogic product, according to Davis, with the program tending to focus on the enterprise.  Dell also points to the lowered threshold for deal registration as a success and improving processes to make SMB sales a better fit for the channel.


Still, one person didn’t hesitate to jump on Dell’s quarterly numbers, writing here on ChannelWeb Connect that “every loss for Dell is a win for the VAR channel.”


Is that feeling still pervasive? It’s actually somewhat ironic for me to see that response because it shows that everything about Dell is circular.


In the past few earnings calls Michael Dell has talked about the “powerful hardware refresh cycle” that is coming with Windows 7. He talked about that again last week. EqualLogic was a bright spot in the past; it was in the last quarter for Dell as well. In the past solution providers have bashed Dell despite any progress that the company may have made.


The Dell-go-round continues.


Unfortunately for Davis and Dell the only thing that is going to shine up the vendor’s reputation is time and commitment. Greg Davis and his team seem to be heading the right direction and taking solution provider feedback to heart.


But for most solution providers the hard fought good will that Davis has been winning will be demolished the first time Dell makes a direct sale, botches a delivery or refuses to acknowledge a qualified deal.


That’s probably not fair, but emotions surrounding the Dell issue run deep. And only time and a continued support for the channel will break the cycle of the Dell merry-go-round.

4 Comments 0 References Permalink

Face to face marketing works best, but Facebook to Facebook may be the next best thing. Custom systems builders caught in the conundrum of  “I need to spend more money on marketing to grow my business” and “I can afford to spend money on marketing” are turning to social media as a way to speak directly to customers.

 

Everything Channel research has long shown that fastest growing solution providers are the ones who spend most on marketing, often upwards of 10 percent of their annual revenue. But in this economy tithing on marketing is a tall order. A research number I like better is one showing 83 percent of college students access a social media site daily.

 

This phenomenon is not lost on custom systems builders. Component shortages with corresponding rising prices are just one of the issues creating both confusion and opportunity in the market. And instantaneous free marketing on social media sites may be the best way to capitalize. One custom systems builder, for example, alerted customers that memory prices had doubled and were likely poised to double again. His Facebook marketing message: Don’t put off new system purchases or memory upgrades. A few days later, when memory prices jumped again, he updated his Facebook customers with the message that DDR2 prices had reached parity with DDR3 memory so opt for DDR3 on your next purchase.

 

Systems builders now understand that better and faster applies to marketing and not just systems building. Those that don’t take social media marketing seriously risk falling behind.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Not long ago, News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch made public his intense distaste for Google Newsand other content aggregators. Murdoch argued that having content from his various newspapers, from The Wall Street Journal to The New York Post, linked to by Google and Yahoo! and other indexing search engines doesn't help News Corp. because its merely exposing the articles to readers outside of the company's core audience -- and giving Google and other sites huge Web traffic numbers, too.

 

Thus, Murdoch threatened to block Google from all News Corp. sites. And it looks like it wasn't an idle threat, either. News Corp. has had talks with Microsoft about teaming up to drop Google down a peg.

 

According to a report in The Financial Times (which I found on Google News, by the way), Microsoft has had preliminary discussions with News Corp. about paying Murdoch's company to "de-index" all of its sites from Google. The report also states that Microsoft has approached other large online publishers with similar offers. Microsoft has stepped up its competition with Google recently by launching the Bing search engine, which has already won some market share gains.

 

It will be interesting to see where this all goes. Google has already responded indirectly to Murdoch by saying that companies can opt out of Google News and request to be removed completely from Google's search index. If News Corp. leaves Google and makes Microsoft's Bing its exclusive search engine, will others follow? Will there be a bidding war between Google and Microsoft over the best content publishers? And can we trust either company to NOT meddle with the news coverage of themselves? Will Google News have more negative-toned Microsoft stories than a Bing-powered news index? Will Microsoft steer its news content away from harsh product reviews or bad publicity, for example, about the software giant's reseller channel?

 

Mark Cuban, who has blogged frquently about this topic recently, chimed in today suggesting the Associated Press and Reuters would take a cash payout from Microsoft to become Bing exclusive. Suddenly, it looks like content publishers may be in the driver's seat again and the aggregators. Will search engines have to start paying newspapers and magazines back in exchange for linking to their content?

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

This week, at XChange Tech Innovator in Las Vegas, we presented the 2009 Tech Innovator Awards. Awards went to those companies that created the most dynamic new opportunities for solution providers, and winners included companies like Fortinet, Xerox and Panasonic, who each snagged "Innovator of the Year" awards. Check out all the winners in our slide show, and look for more details coming soon.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

The site:

 

http://www.videosurf.com/

 

Is A video search engine. I know most of us think of youtube.com immediately when we think video, but give this video search engine A try when your looking for video on the internet!

As always let me know what you think.


Chris

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

One of the more difficult pieces of the managed services sales cycle is introducing managed services to customers who are not used to looking to you for their managed service needs.  I have had to go through this scenario at two different VARs as we introduced more managed services to our portfolio.  In both situations, the customers were very comfortable purchasing hardware, software and some services, but when it came to the new services (co-lo, managed print, disaster recovery…) the customers thought of someone else and I often did not find out about the project until it was too late. 

From these experiences I have found a few ways to introduce and incorporate these new services with my existing customer base:

-Create a Service-List:  A great way to let your customers know the full spectrum of services you provide is to create a list/brochure/wiki that lists them all out.  Make sure the list includes the services, a brief description and the supported technologies.  While this list won’t do the selling for you, it will give you a great springboard to start further managed service conversations. 

-Lunch and learn overview:  This is one of the most basic and most effective ways to both inform your customer on your services and educate yourself on customer needs that you may not have been aware.  This can be done either in person or remote.  I have found it surprisingly successful to let the IT group open up the invitations.  More times than not, my biggest cheerleaders here have come from non-IT entities (i.e. Purchasing, CFO, Marketing…).

-Re-purpose previous successes: Take a successful engagement from a previous customer and share some of the highlights with your current customer.  This is a personal favorite of mine because I can introduce metrics into the conversation.  Few things speak louder than numbers on a paper, and if you can take some proven savings and show them to a customer, you will definitely gain their attention and usually become a discussion point at their next meeting. 

What other ways have you found to bring new services to your new or existing base?

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is telling everyone that will listen that Windows 7 is selling like crazy -- flying off the shelves, even, like it was some kind of mythical Cabbage Patch Kid/Tickle Me Elmo hybrid. It's been almost a month since the new operating system launched, and Ballmer has stated that this version of Windows has sold twice as many copies over the same period that any other version of Windows.

I find that extremely hard to believe. And here's why:\

 

1) The economy sucks. Whether you think the government stimulus funds worked or not, unemployment is still high and consumer confidence is still low. And Ballmer himself just recently painted an extremely pessimistic picture of the situation when he said that IT spending would never recover to the levels seen earlier in this decade. If that's the case, then Windows 7 must be some kind of amazing, ultra-powerfu, recession-busting product. Look, the OS has gotten positive reviews, but not that positive.

 

2) We've heard this before. Not to sound like a smarmy Apple advertisement, but we have. Microsoft always says that the latest version of Windows is the biggest and best-selling version yet. Even Vista. And that was before the company essentially ordered retailers to stop selling Windows XP machines.

 

3) Upgrade issues. Apparently, this is a real hitch for Windows 7. As ChannelWeb previously reported, the upgrade process hasn't been a disaster, but there have enough complaints and frustrated customers to make this an issue for Microsoft.

 

4) Divided views on increased PC sales. Michael Dell says Windows 7 is going to provide a major boost for new PC sales. But we expect him to say such a thing, especially since his business is hurting right now and he needs all the positive buzz he can get. And yes, NPD Group reports that Windows 7 boxed sales were up a whopping 234 percent over Vista's sales during the first few days since launch. But perspectives differ. Gartner, for example, says Windows 7 won't have a huge effect on new PC sales this year. "Although the buzz surrounding Windows 7 has generally been quite positive, we don't expect the market to significantly deviate from its normal seasonal trends in reaction to its release," said George Shiffler, research director at Gartner. Media outlets are reporting that PC vendors haven't seen a big increase, either. It would help if Microsoft could provide some visibility on Windows 7, which brings us to my last point...

 

5) Microsoft won't divulge the numbers. Why? If sales of so great, why not just release the sales figures? What's to hide? (Jeez, I sound like Glenn Beck right now). The Wall Street Journal reports that since Windows Vista sold 20 million copies in its first month (during a slightly less horrific economic environment), then Ballmer's claims for Windows 7 would put sales at around 40 million or better.

 

Again, if Windows 7 business is booming, then it would only make sense for Microsoft to release the figures. But it hasn't, and you have to wonder why. Maybe new PC sales, which is usually the most common way people buy a new OS, aren't that great. But we don't know, and we won't know until Microsoft opens up. Until then, I reserve the right to be extremely skeptical.

2 Comments 0 References Permalink

Our Question of the Week this week dared to ask which one word best describes 2009?

You did not shy away.

The non-scientific straw poll went to the glass-half-full consortium. About 70 percent responded with a positive term.

We had one flip-flopper, two rule-breakers, only one ALL CAP WRITER, and to my surprise, those of you who chose to cast your entry under the anonymous protection of the Business Transformation Site tempered your responses quite prudishly. About as bad as it got in there was a reference to using the toilet.

Some notables: Payback, lame, enlightening, BS, and my favorite one (no, we did not stuff the ballot): Transformation.

The polls are still open. Give us your word, here.

 

 

 

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Here are a few things that my company has done in order to continue to lower costs:

1.            Use Linux servers over appliances.  This allows a company to charge more for labor and lowers the cost of the overall project.  The issue with this is that Linux services do not have the same support options that appliances have.  For example, my company setup a Linux load balancer and after a month of it working correctly, it started to favor one server over another.  For companies that use appliance load balancers, one (or several) call can get support on possible problems and how to resolve the problem.

2.            Offer support contracts for products that are end-of-life by the vendor.  A lot of companies are not willing to pay for the labor to upgrade their equipment and are willing to use the current version.  One of the things that my company is doing is telling customers that we will support their environment to best case scenario until they have no choice but to upgrade.  

It is important to keep the bottom line in mind, but we also make sure we still have the customer's best interests at heart.  If the client opts to go for a cheaper solution, always get it in writing first.  While I also care about my client’s best interest, I also look out for my company.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

This week’s blog stems from the community poll question that’s been up asking: How do you primarily bill for your services? (which is still up, so cast you vote!)

So far, I‘m surprised that the response that mentions using all three billing options isn't way ahead of the pack.

One of the things that I have learned from my years of experience in IT is that as a Reseller\Service Provider we have to be flexible. All of us may have a preference of how we like to bill, but it all comes down to how the customer’s business handles budgets and financials. The key is to be flexible, because a happy customer means more business for our companies.

Another solution that most resellers\service providers don’t take advantage of is converting customers from break\fix (hourly), to managed services contracts.

When I first started in this business I struggled with how to approach this topic with my customers. How your customer feels about your business relationship is the key to this conversion. Don’t ruin the relationship by nitpicking billing hours, or not making yourself readily available at critical times (It will cost you in the long run).

Go the extra mile, make improvement suggestions, and generate documentation (documentation is huge because there is a lack of this in just about every IT shop). Once the foundation is set, your sales angle should be that managed services contracts will stabilize a customer’s IT budget, and lower overall costs.

Also, building that relationship that I mentioned will ease a lot of the difficulties associated with billing. You are less likely to be questioned about every billable minute if you’re trusted by the customer.

Let’s share some ideas on how to make this process more successful to benefit our community.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Systems builders hoping to sell virtualization to their SMB clients might consider giving it away for free. Some custom systems builders report that they’re installing the free version of VMware on new servers as well as putting it on customers’ existing systems. Of course the free software is a stripped down version and is more of a marketing ploy to give SMBs a taste of virtualization. But who cares?

 

Marketing is what’s needed if custom systems builders are to sell virtualization to their smaller SMB clients. If you listen to VMware, the company claims that its fastest growing customer segment is companies with fewer than 100 employees. And some market research companies project that 50 percent of SMBs will embrace virtualization in the next year.

 

Geez, that must mean that SMBs have experienced a virtualization epiphany and are flocking to VMware in droves. I don’t think so. SMBs, if they do understand the benefits of virtualization, still struggle with why, as a little guy with just a few servers, do they need it.

 

SMBs can go directly to VMware and download the virtualization software on their own. But I don’t think many are. SMBs need to be shown the virtues of virtualization by a trusted partner that understands their business. That’s what many custom systems builders do. The virtualization conversation is a great way to cement existing relationships, build new ones, and sell more consulting services along with custom systems. Sometimes it makes sense to give stuff away for free.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Look, I like Luke Wilson. He's a funny guy. I've been a fan ever since he and his brother Owen showed up in Wes Anderson's indie comedy "Bottle Rocket" in 1996. But he's not exactly a commanding pitch man. And that's just one of the problems with AT&T Wireless' new TV spot, which is a rebuttal to Verizon's catchy, compelling and extremely effective "There's a Map For That" advertising campaign.

 

AT&T suffered a major setback Wednesday in war with Verizon. AT&T sued its rival earlier this month and sought a restraining order against Verizon to force the company to stop running its 3G map ads. But a judge denied AT&T's request and stated that while Verizon's ad camapign might be a clever and a little tricky, the overall claims were true.

That's what Verizon has been saying all along, too. The company filed a legal brief with the court arguing that AT&T wasn't contesting the facts of the ad -- just the presentation -- and the only reason it was suing Verizon was because "the truth hurts."

 

Ouch. Well, the judge apparently agreed. So AT&T decided to rebound from that major setback by running new prime time TV spots featuring their own side-by-side comparison with Verizon. The ad, featuring Wilson in what looks like a deserted office building, claims that AT&T has the fastest 3G network. The ad also points out that AT&T's service allows you to surf the Web and talk on the phone at the same time (which I've never done, but hey, I might some day). But then the ad begins to reach a little. The next item on the board is most popular smartphones, which goes to AT&T -- come on, that has little to do with the wireless service carrier. Then the next item touts "access to over a 100,000 apps," which again goes in AT&T's favor.

 

And the last item? Well, that is a name that starts with the letter "V," which of course he awards to Verizon. It's even less funny when you watch it. And that's the problem here. Verizon's ads work because they riff on Apple's familiar and somewhat annoying "There's An App For That" campaign, which promotes the thousands upon thousands of popular yet nich-focused and even frivolous applications for the iPhone. And better yet, Verizon's ads have clearly struck a nerve with AT&T -- and perhaps consumers as well. AT&T's lawsuit and Verizon's subsequent Round 1 victory have only given more weight and publicity to the ads.

 

And if this is the best response AT&T can muster, then it's in trouble.

 

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

This past Tuesday, we talked about Nvidia and its lack of presence in the DirectX 11 category. Now, let's focus on ATI, a company that is in a completely different position.

 

Where Nvidia has stumbled, ATI has sprinted towards the finish line. In the past two months, ATI has launched its latest line of graphics cards, the Radeon HD 5000 series. With five different models to choose from, ranging from the $150 5750 to the $400 5870, ATI has its bases covered at every price point. This is excellent for every kind of system builder, from the budget box to the gaming goliath.

 

ATI added yet another card to its 5000 series today: the 2 GB 5970. Doing away with the "X2" moniker for dual-GPU cards, the 5970 is one card with two 5870 GPUs on board. At $600, this is certainly not for the frugal system builder, but it is hands down the fastest single card graphics solution on the planet.


In less than two months, ATI has launched not one, not two, but five different graphics cards, all of which are DirectX 11-compatible. So, for all you builders out there who are aching to put together a Windows 7-based system, ATI is waiting in the wings with a plethora of graphics hardware to choose from.

 

Until Nvidia gets around to launching the GT300 series, ATI is king of the DirectX 11 realm. The only snag at this point is keeping up with demand. A quick trip over to NewEgg shows that over half of the HD 5000 cards listed are currently out of stock. Hopefully, stock will be replenished in time for holiday shopping, but since there's no DX11 competition in sight, ATI can breathe easy...for the moment.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

We have each heard the battle cry: “Move to managed services!”

But what does it really take? Turning your existing business model upside down and inside out?

I for one am growing tired of all these so-called MSP experts sprouting up with their Universities, books, lectures, etc.

They all just make me wonder: If they are/were so good at being MSPs, then why are they trying to sell books and monthly tuitions to make a buck?

This is the ugly side of the managed service equation. It is difficult enough to incorporate and move to an MSP model - sorting through the plethora of monitoring and management platforms available – and it sometime makes matters worse having to deal with MSP experts who have been there and done that and will give you their secrets for the low, low price of $99…

But wait, there’s more! Order now and receive my Guide to Happy Customers and a free MSP Toolkit. It’s a $350 value!

It takes planning and patience to move into managed services, and here is something the experts may not tell you. Managed services do not have to be all or nothing! You don’t have to move away from your core business, or drop it all, to become an MSP.

We at powersolution.com were engaged in managed services well before they were called managed services. We weren’t the first. Others came before us. But we made a decision to add a recurring revenue component to our business back in 1998, and we utilized the technology available at the time to streamline and transform our services business. It may not have been perfect or pretty, but we got the job done.

We use managed service components to create efficiencies in our business, allowing us to manage our client’s infrastructures more efficiently. This translated into cost savings for us, and our clients.

Bottom line, you don’t need to spend money on Universities and How-To books. There is plenty of quality information available to you at no cost.

Send me any questions you may have.

3 Comments 0 References Permalink

If your A firefox internet browser user you need to keep your plug-in's up to date! If you do not keep the plug-in's up to date it's possible to get hacked and lose control of your computer.


Just browse to this web-site:

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/

 

It automatically checks and gives you options to update your plug-ins!

 

As always please feel free to email any questions, comments or inquiries.

 

Christopher C. Welber
Managing Consultant
laymantech.com
http://www.laymantech.com/
The Blog - www.omguru.com - Info that can help you live and work better.
(646) 478-9730 Fax
646-833-8254 Google Voice!

1 Comments 0 References Permalink

It’s not every day you hear one like this. Asustek is rumored to be considering purchasing Toshiba's mobile PC business, in a bid to become one of the world’s largest notebook PC makers.

 

Asustek, or Asus, is the hardware company kicked out off the netbook craze with its Eee PC-line of mini-notebooks. Toshiba is currently the world’s fourth largest mobile PC maker behind HP, Acer and Dell. Asus, as far as I can tell, isn’t actively engaged with the solution provider channel, which could raise some red flags for long time Toshiba partners.

 

Toshiba, on the other hand, does have a channel program and engages with solution providers. Of course, some partners raised their eyebrows when Toshiba America Information Systems earlier this year decided to “eliminate a layer of management” and part with channel stalwart Jerry Lumpkin.

 

I’ve reached out to Asus a few times for information on a reseller channel program as well as for information on forth coming projects. The only responses that have come my way have been about specific products. But I was curious about any potential channel program the computer maker might have, so I perused the open and public job reqs the company has posted.

 

Right now the open positions are focused primarily on sales reps for retail and e-tail channels. There are a few job postings that include the phrase “Develop and execute resellers channel program.” At the very least that looks like Asus might be pointed in the right direction. Unfortunately for some, those positions were all posted in Spain, Portugal, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

 

That doesn’t mean there aren’t reseller channel development jobs available in the U.S. Instead it just that Asus isn’t looking to fill those positions currently.

 

But with regard to Toshiba, perhaps Asus would purchase Toshiba America Information Systems and use it as the skeleton of a channel program in this country? Dell had something of a framework of a reseller channel program in place before its 2008 purchase of EqualLogic. But, boy, once it got access to those happy EqualLogic vendors its channel program sure took off, didn’t it?

 

Maybe Asustek is looking to ape that success.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Attached. Interesting stuff.

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

I had a client back in 1995 who said to me they wanted to pay us a fixed fee each month and for us to handle any technical issues that came from it. At the time I was too scared to take the risk that whatever fee I placed on this service, the client wouldn’t turn around costing me large amounts of money. Oh how I wish that I had the foresight to have made the leap back then to what we now call managed services.

This same customer also offered up the concept of renting the software and hardware from us for a fixed monthly fee, now what we know as Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and Hardware-as-a-Service (HaaS).

Today, however, our business covers the monthly payroll bill alone with the money we get from managed services. That’s a nice feeling to have really – to know pretty much that everyone will get paid when you start the month. We are also doing more and more with SaaS/HaaS for our clients.

Why do I mention this? It’s simple really. Most SMB solution providers (like me) are technical people that have learned to be business people. They are techo first and foremost, and entrepreneur second.  As such we are often a little more conservative than “true business people” and we fail to take a risk when maybe we should.  I’ve learned over time to think long and hard about where things are going and how I might be able to take advantage of it.  I’m still not sure that I’m taking full advantage of the ideas my team comes up with, but at least I recognize that fact and seek guidance from others when I think I might be onto a winner.

The next time a customer asks you for something out of the ordinary, take a few moments to consider where this might lead to. You never know - you might be a trend-setter yourself and might be on the crest of the wave even before the wave starts to build.

Have you had a great idea, not taken advantage of it and then regretted it later?

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Nvidia has posted another cartoon on its Web site "Intel's Insides," poking more fun at Intel. And unlike some of the pevious six cartoons on Nvidia's smarmy site, this one is actually somewhat humorous.


But again, it begs the question: should Nvidia be messing around with cartoons when it should be focused on shipping its next-generation DirectX 10 graphics card? Wouldn't Nvidia be better off solving the its own issues?


I get what Nvidia is attempting here. I do. It's trying to show up Big Bad Intel. But it's trying to wage two wars right now: one with Intel, and one with the smaller but still formidable AMD. Sure, Nvidia posted strong third quarter earnings and raised its forecast for Q4. And yes, the add-on graphics market is rebounding. However, Jon Peddie Research reports that the fourth quarter/holiday season could be an extremely competitive period for Nvidia, now that AMD has released its next-gen cards while Nvidia's offering languishes in delays.


Peddie states: "AMD’s got a brand new set of graphics cards ready for the holiday (and Windows 7) season. Its launch of the Evergreen (Radeon HD 5000 series) generation has equipped the company with strong offerings for the Enthusiast and Performance segments, ready to entice somewhat-more-optimistic consumers. Nvidia, however, will have to get by this holiday season with previous-generation products, as it hustles to get products based on its ambitious Fermi generation ready for (what appears to be) the first quarter of 2010."


Hear that, Nvidia? It's time to hustle. Put down the pen and pick up the sword because AMD is waiting for you on the battlefield.

 

intelsinside6.jpg

2 Comments 0 References Permalink

I saw what might be my favorite headline of the year earlier this morning. It came from another publication that I won’t name, but it made me laugh when I saw it. The headline read: “Trojans likely to follow Win 7 activation hack.”

 

I know there’s a little more to it than just viruses to begin attacking Windows 7 environments. But still, the irony of looking at a headline talking about viruses on PCs made me laugh.

 

For a company that is constantly issuing patches to fix problems, holes and vulnerabilities, noting that Trojans are likely to follow in the wake of the release of the new OS last month is sort of like worrying about whether or not the sun will rise.

 

I’d be willing to bet none of you reading this blog is going to have this thought occur to them:

 

“You know, maybe I should buy some antivirus software to protect my customers’ Windows 7 environment.”

 

At this point, isn’t virus protection for Windows sort of like taking a drink when you’re thirsty: instinct? I should also point out that Windows isn’t the only environment that’s being targeted. Though Apple isn’t talking about it much, viruses targeting the OS X environment -- and more recently some iPhone worms -- have been proliferating.


Still it's important to remember that Windows 7 may be targeted by malicious code.

3 Comments 0 References Permalink

Gotta keep it clean here in the community, but . . .

If you don't want to keep it clean, cast your vote here

A full report will follow, including the top five words, and descriptions of The Worst!

16 Comments 0 References Permalink

Direct X 11 is here, so where’s the new graphics hardware from Nvidia? Nowhere to be seen…

 

When Nvidia first announced its GT300 series of GPUs, the release date was set to 10/2009. Well, October has come and gone, and no next-gen Nvidia cards showed up – although the release of more GT 200 card models is good for the mid-range system builder. There has been little in official word from the graphics giant. However, during a financial conference call with analysts, Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang said that the GT300 cards would be delayed until Q1 of the 2011 fiscal year, which for Nvidia is January 26 through April 26 in 2010.

 

If one is to give Nvidia a little elbow room, the delay means we wouldn’t see new hardware until February, or maybe even March. Going with the latter means the GT300 cards (presumably a GTX 380 and GTX 360) would hit the market roughly six months after AMD’s Direct X 11-capable HD 5000 series cards.

 

Not only does AMD have four high to mid range models available in the 5800 and 5700 series already, but a dual-GPU 5970 is expected within the next few weeks, and 5600 and 5300 series cards should arrive in the next few months.

 

While no official reason is being given for the delay, the culprit may be the lack of 40nm chips available for use in the GT300 series. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has yet to reach its full manufacturing capacity when it comes to 40nm processors, and everyone involved is feeling the squeeze.

 

If the GT300 series doesn’t launch until Q1 2010, Nvidia is in real danger of losing some serious market share to their friends over at ATI.

2 Comments 1 References Permalink

GFInformation we are looking for the best Cloud Computer Security Solution. For us to make sense of this new world, we must consider four critical questions.


  • Data is exploding and it’s in silos

  • New business & process demands


  • My infrastructure is inflexible and costly


  • Our resources are limited I Need Insight I Need to Work


Dynamic Infrastructure Enterprise Information Analytics Emerging Areas of Focus Amongst Cloud Clients SecurityVA_office.JPG

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

Did you know 38 percent of U.S. travelers will pay more to travel companies that protect the environment?

 

Hang on, it gets better. Those travelers who'll pay more for green goods and services will pay up to 10 percent more, says the Travel Industry of America.

 

Flashback to early 2009. A landscape architect named Nick Overall is honored as the Norwalk Tree Alliance's Tree Advocate of the Year. The appreciative Mr. Overall said news of the award immediately attracted new business from conservation-minded customers.

 

How do I know all this? I read the new Business Transformation Study on the Business Transformation site right here.

 

It's my reason for two green blogs in a row. Bookmark it real quick. Check it out later.  

0 Comments 0 References Permalink

The legal battle between Apple and Mac clone creator Psystar isn't over yet, but Psystar may have indeed been dealt a fatal blow with the recent court decision that favored Apple. The judge ruled that Psystar's primary defense -- that Apple was misused its copyright of its own software -- didn't hold water. The case will resume in court next month, when Apple can seek an injunction against Psystar and its Mac clone products and shut them down, possibly for good.

 

But while the Psystar saga may be coming to an end, the battle will continue to rage on as "Hackintosh" efforts continue. So what does the court ruling mean for the debate about copyright protection, EULA restrictions, DMCA law and digital property rights?

 

Personally, I'd love to be able to replace the copy of Windows Vista on my PC with OS X (but only if I could still play PC games on the system). I've long favored Mac's operating system over Windows. And I think it's a mistake for Apple to not at least explore licensing OS X to run on PCs. But if they want to be stubborn and restrictive, well, it's their software and its their right to be proprietary. Case closed.

 

But the demand for OS X on PCs is apparently growing, and if folks can buy PCs with preloaded versions of OS X on them, then they'll just find software tools to circumvent the install restrictions (Psystar and others have already released tools that do just that, although tinkering with OS X can ruin your PC hardware). I've read and heard a lot of negative reactions toward Apple in this case. They sympathize with Psystar and wonder why, if I've legally purchased a software product, can't I install that product on the machine of my choice? What about my rights as a software owner?

 

I certainly understand these feelings, but I suppose the bottom line is that you are not actually buying software -- you are licensing it. And you are agreeing to the terms of the end user license agreement. Cumbersome? Without a doubt. Annoyingly restrictive? For sure. But is it illegal? Is Apple really misusing its copyright power by determining where OS X can run and where it can't, as Psystar claimed?

 

I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know. But judging by the scores of computer enthusiasts raging about the court's decision in this case, it seems like a lot of folks -- both PC and Mac fans -- are befuddled by the law and enraging that their power is so severely limited by Big Bad Apple.

 

But doesn't Apple have the right to make its own decisions regarding its products? In the same way Google can give its products away for free and let anyone download or use them, Apple is taking a more restrictive route. And it makes sense when you think about the dangers of producing and distributing software in today's world. Software piracy is prevalent, and so is hacking and modding. Apple wants to retain control of what kind of machines its software runs on, and to that I can sympathize. I'd be terrified to create any kind of software development business, whether its an OS or a PC game, for fear that my products would be looted and my revenues cut in half -- or more.

 

And that's the catch: I suppose in this day and age, a company would be crazy to NOT have cumbersome and annoyingly restrictive software licenses. In any event Apple should be allowed to do what it wants with its products, and consumers should have the right to either agree to its terms or walk away. And at the end of the day, Apple should win its case against Psystar, lock, stock and barrel. If you created a software product and another company copied it, violated the EULA and began reselling it, you'd argue the same thing.

0 Comments Permalink
1 2 3 ... 24 Previous Next