Currently Being Moderated

Microsoft filed its 10-K annual report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday morning, outlining its 2009 fiscal year results in greater detail and providing more information about perceived strengths and threats to its business.


While the company repeated assertions from its last annual report that rival Apple and the Linux community are making market-share inroads, Microsoft went out of its way to write an additional line in its annual report detail what it perceives as a risk to its business:


"Partners such as Hewlett-Packard and Intel have been actively working with alternative Linux-based operating systems," Microsoft wrote, providing no additional detail.


While it's been known for some time that HP - - which sells some notebooks and netbooks and servers with Linux - - and Intel have dedicated some resources to Linux development, this is the first time that Microsoft has singled out its two biggest and arguably most important technology partners for this work. While the language in 10-K reports is traditionally dry, legalistic and boilerplate, for a company like Microsoft to add that information for the first time is notable. It also comes at a time when Microsoft reported a double-digit decline in its client software business even as it reported selling more than 300 million units of Windows Vista over the past two years. (It sold 130 million units two years ago and 180 million units of Vista last year, although it doesn't specify how many units were sold or activated with "downgrade rights" to Windows XP.)


How is Microsoft responding to threats from Apple and Linux? By pumping tons of new funds into R&D. According to its 10-K:


"During fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, research and development expense was $9.0 billion, $8.2 billion, and $7.1 billion, respectively. These amounts represented 15 percent, 14 percent, and 14 percent, respectively, of revenue in each of those years. We plan to continue to make significant investments in a broad range of research and product development efforts."

 

That leads to the question: Can Microsoft gain enough through R&D to stem the tide of Linux and Apple against its client software business?

Share this blog: Digg   Del.icio.us   Reddit       LinkedIn  


Jul 30, 2009 8:15 PM nulled nulled    says:

HP sells massive computers through outlet, BEST BUY. Running Vista, no less. Intel, the mother of all CPUs and other computer circuits, probably more CORE of the entire business.

 

The only way MS could compete with HP (as they are now a threat) is to make their windows licenses more expensive to HP and therefore making say DELL cheaper to buy, noting it would not have this restriction. ( although even dell computers is a bad choice since it heavely supports Ubuntu/Linux..haha )

 

Intel on the other hand...no competition there, unless MS wants to buy out AMD and compete there...

 

Now, if the exeecutives at MS want to fully control all playing fields, they would finally have to open up their own Best Buy. Circuit city would have been a good condidate for such a move, although they went  outta bussiness a while back.

 

So, why people are 'alarmed' about these HP/INTEL remarks Im not sure... they are just detailed reports, as MS is a top grade business player, maybe even to the point of 'cut throat', then they include ALL details into their report, especially since the economic down turn.

 

Finally, MS was actually ABLE to sell 300 million copies of CRAP software, given they have  little to NO competition aside from Apple and a small contingincy with the Netbook/Linux which is now nearly nullified. With the release of Windows 7 looking to be what Vista SHOULD have been.... the future looks VERY bright for MS and its awesome .NET api and tool sets.

 

MS has little to no worries, even if there is a small threat, and nothing was done to stop it, at least a little, MS is in such a good prime position no matter what other entities come along ( namely Apple and Linux ) that MS is nearly an impenitrible FORTRESS.

Jul 31, 2009 9:39 AM emoltzen emoltzen    says in response to nulled:

I haven't heard of a single business case - - not one - - where there is a planned enterprise migration to Windows 7 - - let alone Vista. Yes: Businesses usually wait a year or until SP1 of an operating system to test the waters. But that's what everybody said about Vista, and the business world is still sticking with XP.

 

Microsoft will hit a big home run with Windows 7 in retail. Of course it will. We all know that. But that's not where Microsoft's problems are. It needs to convince the business world to keep buying its desktop software and that's not getting easier, it's getting more difficult.

Aug 1, 2009 5:59 AM HomeUser HomeUser    says:

This must indeed be a shock for MS. The Windows monopoly in the consumer market is greatly depended on the cooperation of their partners who bundle Windows with their hardware, making it almost impossible having a price benefit by not buying Windows with the hardware.

 

I think there is no other market place where a situation like this would not have led to more offers trying to benefit from the price difference. Even if there may be disagreement about the quality of the different options. And now some of the bigger partners dare indeed make, on a very limited schale, some alternative offers.

 

That monopoly is not only supported by the bundling of the OEM version of Windows but also by other "partners" selling peripherals who put things like "Minimum system requirements Windows XX" on their packages, even if the hardware will very well work with other OSes. Apparently no information may be given to those who dare to use something else. Not a link, not a hint where to check for a new driver wen it arrives, not even a disclaimer that it may work but that the company does not support the soft for it.

 

It looks like the consumer should not even know that they may be alternatives that can function. The non-Windows user is send in the dessert searching for it himself. Not a problem for the well experienced user (and for many hardware the soft does a great job solving the problem itself). But then they say Linux would only be usable by this group.

 

If I understand it correct, using a monopoly to extend it to other sectors is not legal. I suppose using a monopoly to sustain it, is not legal either. I don't know if this way of supporting the monopoly is very legal.