Currently Being Moderated

Another Argument Against Windows 7 Upgrade

Posted by emoltzen on Aug 21, 2009 10:06:17 AM

Wired's GadgetLab Web site has published a piece by Brian X. Chen listing "7 Reasons to Avoid Windows 7."


A top reason, Chen writes, is the lack of support for direct XP-to-Windows 7 upgrades. Microsoft recommends "clean" installations, which involves saving all applications and data on another drive, wiping the PC's hard drive and installing Windows 7 fresh on the hard drive.


Chen correctly notes that this shouldn't be a huge deal, since responsible parties are backing everything up constantly anyway. But, he notes: "But we understand why this would bug many XP users. For one, it’s time-consuming. For another, many are sensitive about their data, and they don’t trust Microsoft. (We don’t blame them.) Third, if XP is working fine for you, why fix something that isn’t broken?"


We saw much the same back in February.


While I gave a presentation on this, Thursday, at XChange '09 in Washington, D.C. (you can check out the PowerPoint here), one solution provider argued that folks at Microsoft have put together a work-around making it, in fact, possible to go from XP to Windows 7 without a clean install or interceding upgrade to Vista. (The workaround would include altering the registry of the XP system, he said.)


Even if that's the case, it's not a work-around that Microsoft officially supports and, in fact, the company is recommending the "clean" installation route.  Other commentators, including  The Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg, have recently begun pointing out the XP-to-Windows-7 upgrade fiasco.


And other rumblings I've begun hearing this week from well-connected industry sources are beginning to cast doubt on whether Windows 7 will have any success in business accounts despite all the improvements over Windows Vista.


October, when Windows 7 launches, will bring more answers.

Share this blog: Digg   Del.icio.us   Reddit       LinkedIn  
Tags: 7, windows


Aug 21, 2009 11:06 AM JsckOfShadows JsckOfShadows    says:

We shall have to wait and see, of course, but I already have one major selling point for the SOHO/SB market, aside from much improved security even over Vista, who lack a dedicated sysadmin.  Libraries.  The more I work with them, the more I appreciate the simplicity they bring to networked storage administration.  Basically, you don't have much to administer after creating one.  I have even renamed a folder behind Win'7's back and it happily kept the link.  Recall with shares how much work can be involved tracking one down to the source folder and adjusting it?  Or resorting to DFS to sort things out, which is what a dedicated sysadmin is supposed to do.  Um, what dedicated sysadmin?  Right.    They'll be other issues but this is promising already as I have a very detailed file system ontology here just to keep things managable which I can now, essentially, toss.  This is one case where they really did fix what wasn't really broke by simplifying the heck out of it.   Yea!

Aug 24, 2009 10:51 AM prusso prusso    says:

A good practice is to do a clean install anyways, there are many tools to capture the users information before installation and then bring that information in after installation. I can remember all of the gripes about Windows XP when it came out and why would you upgrade from 2000? If you want to be stuck in the dark ages, go ahead and stick with XP, but when Microsoft finally says no to support, every IT manager better have a good excuse for not keeping up with the times or at least have a good way of supporting their users. So far 7 has been very good, of course there are a few applications that don't behave in the new environment but 7 handles those applications better than previous versions (blue screen of death), so far I have not had the system lock up or ended up in a postion where I had to use the power button to reset the system, I remember having to do that often with XP.