<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Inside Ball</title>
    <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Inside Ball</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.7 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-17T21:13:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;The Channel, Giving Back And The Future</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/08/17/the-channel-giving-back-and-the-future#comment-1611</link>
      <description>What an amazing experience. I feel privileged to have been given the opportunity to play a small part in making it happen.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>RMCompufix</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/08/17/the-channel-giving-back-and-the-future#comment-1611</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-17T21:13:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Is SaaS Up or Down?</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/11/is-saas-up-or-down#comment-1545</link>
      <description>Until there is a fair way for VARs to sell, bill and build on cloud solutions, adoption is going to take awhile. The "do more with less" is more evident in PaaS type implementations.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:12:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>dcheng</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/11/is-saas-up-or-down#comment-1545</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-14T23:12:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;IT Should Be Getting More Focus in Health Care</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1544</link>
      <description>There IS opportunity for IT in healthcare, but...(there always is a but, isn't there?) It's  four-way marriage: the healtcare industry, IT, channel parnters, and the consumer. And as Kevin points out, the consumer is the bottom line. &amp;nbsp; I'm not sure</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>LoraineAntrim</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1544</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-12T15:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Is SaaS Up or Down?</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/11/is-saas-up-or-down#comment-1533</link>
      <description>We're making hay with SaaS, Ed. It depends on the customer. Shoot me a note, I'd be happy to talk more about it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>SecurityTech</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/11/is-saas-up-or-down#comment-1533</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-11T19:33:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;IT Should Be Getting More Focus in Health Care</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1532</link>
      <description>I'm viewing your question at too a high level maybe but here goes...why isn't IT discussed as much as policy, access, funding, etc. in relation to Health Care Reform? &amp;nbsp; As one other commenter noted, there are tons of vendors and users of IT in</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>kevindhorne</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1532</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-11T18:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Higher-Capacity Drives for Notebooks Will Hurt Netbooks</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/higher-capacity-drives-for-notebooks-will-hurt-netbooks#comment-1530</link>
      <description>Thanks for the commentary, and good points. The problem is that smart phones do everything netbooks do, short of allowing you to type on a full keyboard - and smart phones fit into your pocket. My iPhone is an "inexpensive, super portable, web</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>emoltzen</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/higher-capacity-drives-for-notebooks-will-hurt-netbooks#comment-1530</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T15:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Higher-Capacity Drives for Notebooks Will Hurt Netbooks</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/higher-capacity-drives-for-notebooks-will-hurt-netbooks#comment-1542</link>
      <description>I think you've reached a false conclusion. Netbooks are not about storage any more than they are about processor speed. Netbooks excel as inexpensive, super portable, web appliances. They’re often used as secondary or tertiary PC’s. With    802.11n and</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>AECITVP</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/higher-capacity-drives-for-notebooks-will-hurt-netbooks#comment-1542</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T15:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Apple and Expectations</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/apple-and-expectations#comment-1510</link>
      <description>Great post, Ed - I agree. Apple has the same problem Craig's List has: Too much power concentrated in too few hands.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MarcusIT</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/apple-and-expectations#comment-1510</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T22:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;IT Should Be Getting More Focus in Health Care</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1528</link>
      <description>You make a good point Samara, and it's one I hear from solution providers and integrators constantly: why would they enter into the red tape nightmare of a large healthcare enterprise -- with its board members, department heads, administrators and other</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ChadB</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1528</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T15:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;IT Should Be Getting More Focus in Health Care</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1527</link>
      <description>Donn Atkins wrote (in an inadvertently deleted reply): &amp;nbsp; "The IT healthcare solution area is ALL about partnering.  If there ever was an  opportunity for a true solution ecosystem to form,  this is one of those  moments.  No provider will have all</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>emoltzen</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/09/09/it-should-be-getting-more-focus-in-health-care#comment-1527</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T15:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

