<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Channelweb Connect : Blog List - All Communities</title>
    <link>http://community.crn.com/index.jspa?view=blog</link>
    <description>Latest Blog Posts in Channelweb Connect</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.7 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T21:35:52Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Tech Innovator Awards 2009</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/hottopics/2009/11/20/tech-innovator-awards-2009</link>
      <description>This week, at XChange Tech Innovator in Las Vegas, we presented the  2009 Tech Innovator Awards . Awards went to those companies that created the most dynamic new opportunities for solution providers, and winners included companies like Fortinet, Xerox</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">channelweb_awards_and_directories</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/hottopics/2009/11/20/tech-innovator-awards-2009</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T21:35:52Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 day, 17 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/blogs/hottopics/comment/tech-innovator-awards-2009</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/blogs/hottopics/feeds/comments?blogPost=1881</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Video Search Engine, and it's not Youtube?! - Yes - :</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/people/cwelber/blog/2009/11/20/a-video-search-engine-and-its-not-youtube--yes-</link>
      <description>The site: &amp;nbsp; http://www.videosurf.com/ &amp;nbsp; Is A video search engine. I know most of us think of youtube.com immediately when we think video, but give this video search engine A try when your looking for video on the internet! As always let me</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>chriswelber@yahoo.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/people/cwelber/blog/2009/11/20/a-video-search-engine-and-its-not-youtube--yes-</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T19:55:48Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 day, 19 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/people/cwelber/blog/comment/a-video-search-engine-and-its-not-youtube--yes-</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/people/cwelber/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1880</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing Customers to Managed Services</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/20/introducing-customers-to-managed-services</link>
      <description>One of the more difficult pieces of the managed services sales cycle is introducing managed services to customers who are not used to looking to you for their managed service needs.  I have had to go through this scenario at two different VARs as we</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">msp</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/20/introducing-customers-to-managed-services</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T19:23:58Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 day, 19 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/comment/introducing-customers-to-managed-services</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1879</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows 7 Sales: I Want Real Numbers, Microsoft!</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/2009/11/20/windows-7-sales-i-want-real-numbers-microsoft</link>
      <description>Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is telling everyone that will listen that Windows 7 is selling like crazy -- flying off the shelves, even, like it was some kind of mythical Cabbage Patch Kid/Tickle Me Elmo hybrid. It's been almost a month since the new</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">windows_7</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">steve_ballmer</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">windows_vista</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/2009/11/20/windows-7-sales-i-want-real-numbers-microsoft</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T16:07:59Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 days, 6 minutes ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/comment/windows-7-sales-i-want-real-numbers-microsoft</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/feeds/comments?blogPost=1876</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Potty Time</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/managed-print-services/blog/2009/11/20/potty-time</link>
      <description>Our Question of the Week this week dared to ask  which one word best describes 2009 ? You did not shy away. The non-scientific straw poll went to the glass-half-full consortium. About 70 percent responded with a positive term.  We had one flip-flopper,</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>paige.coverage@gmail.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/managed-print-services/blog/2009/11/20/potty-time</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T16:00:16Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 day, 23 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/managed-print-services/blog/comment/potty-time</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/managed-print-services/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1878</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dell’s continued involvement in the channel</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/19/dell-s-continued-involvement-in-the-channel</link>
      <description>I was just looking over Dell’s quarterly numbers and started wondering about Dell’s future in the channel. The previous 24 months (since the EqualLogic acquisition) have been a huge leap in the right direction. Dell has gone from the enemy of the</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">dell</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">channel.</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">sales</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>dmartinez@mnjtech.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/19/dell-s-continued-involvement-in-the-channel</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T00:00:52Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 days, 15 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>3</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/comment/dell-s-continued-involvement-in-the-channel</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1875</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Cost Saving Tips</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/access-security/blog/2009/11/19/real-cost-saving-tips</link>
      <description>Here are a few things that my company has done in order to continue to lower costs:   1.              Use Linux servers over appliances.    This allows a company to charge more for labor and lowers the cost of the overall project.    The issue with this</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">savings</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">cost</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">security</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/access-security/blog/2009/11/19/real-cost-saving-tips</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-19T22:05:33Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 days, 17 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/access-security/blog/comment/real-cost-saving-tips</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/access-security/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1874</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transitioning Customers to Managed Services</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/19/transitioning-customers-to-managed-services</link>
      <description>This week’s blog stems from the community poll question that’s been up asking: How do you primarily bill for your services? (which is still up, so cast you vote!) So far, I‘m surprised that the response that mentions using all three billing options</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">services</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">managed</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/2009/11/19/transitioning-customers-to-managed-services</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-19T21:54:53Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 days, 17 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/comment/transitioning-customers-to-managed-services</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/smb-channel-voice/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1873</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can Systems Builders Profit from Free VMware?</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/groups/custom-systemswhite-box/blog/2009/11/19/can-systems-builders-profit-from-free-vmware</link>
      <description>Systems builders hoping to sell virtualization to their SMB clients might consider giving it away for free. Some custom systems builders report that they’re installing the free version of VMware on new servers as well as putting it on customers’</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/groups/custom-systemswhite-box/blog/2009/11/19/can-systems-builders-profit-from-free-vmware</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-19T16:29:46Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 days, 22 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/groups/custom-systemswhite-box/blog/comment/can-systems-builders-profit-from-free-vmware</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/groups/custom-systemswhite-box/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=1872</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AT&amp;T Responds to Verizon with...Luke Wilson?</title>
      <link>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/2009/11/19/att-responds-to-verizon-withluke-wilson</link>
      <description>Look, I like Luke Wilson. He's a funny guy. I've been a fan ever since he and his brother Owen showed up in Wes Anderson's indie comedy "Bottle Rocket" in 1996. But he's not exactly a commanding pitch man. And that's just one of the problems with</description>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">att</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">lawsuit</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">verizon</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">apple</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">3g</category>
      <category domain="http://community.crn.com/tags">wireless</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>editor@channelweb.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/2009/11/19/att-responds-to-verizon-withluke-wilson</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-19T15:38:06Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 days, 52 minutes ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/comment/att-responds-to-verizon-withluke-wilson</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://community.crn.com/blogs/fudwatch/feeds/comments?blogPost=1871</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

